The Video Baby Monitors Review

Which video child screens are the best? We considered more than 50 potential contenders previously acquiring 10 top video alternatives. We put every video screen through an assortment of thorough next to each other tests to look at the range, sound clearness, video quality, convenience, and that's only the tip of the iceberg. Our procedure and hands-on investigation are intended to figure out which child screens will address your issues and spending plan by narrowing your choices and dialing in the points of interest. The data we've educated can enable you to decide whether you need a Wi-Fi unit or a committed screen, and what highlights you'll discover generally helpful. Read on for help finding the best screen for your child.
The camera with the Infant Optics DXR-8 has the lowest EMF reading out of all the dedicated monitors we tested.

Pros Awesome pictures, confront acknowledgment, simple to utilize, loads of features Wi-Fi extend, heaps of highlights, incredible pictures, simple to use Internet go, extraordinary pictures, flexible long haul use Wi-fi skilled, spending plan benevolent, quality images Great run, clear solid, simple to utilize

Cons Not child particular, costly, poor sound, a few highlights require subscription Sub standard sound, higher value, web dependant No web/no screen, baffling sound Requires web, frustrating sound Not numerous highlights, manual change camera

Base Line Fancy wi-fi with noteworthy video yet the cost may not be justified, despite all the trouble for child monitoring Cool wi-fi choice with every one of the fancy odds and ends that is anything but difficult to use Really cool camera with loads of employments and incredible video for straightforward infant monitoring Straightforward, wi-fi proficient camera with great pictures and an amazing price Our most loved committed screen with great range that is anything but difficult to utilize

Specs Cam IQ Indoor Wi-Fi Care M7 Wi-Fi Cam Indoor Wi-Fi LeFun 1080p Wi-Fi Avent SCD630

Correspondence Technology 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac 802.11 b/g/n 802.11 a/b/g/n 802.11 b/g/n 2.4 GHz FHSS

Indoor Range Test Anywhere You Have Connectivity Anywhere You Have Connectivity Anywhere You Have Connectivity Anywhere You Have Connectivity 5 Walls 92 Feet

Open Field Range Test Anywhere You Have Connectivity Anywhere You Have Connectivity Anywhere You Have Connectivity Anywhere You Have Connectivity 750 Feet

Grow to indicate full appraisals and specs | Hide points of interest

Refresh — October 2018

This audit has gotten a redesign including 5 new items and a couple of new honor champs. We've expelled suspended items from the lineup, and acquainted helpful new contenders with consider.

Best Wi-Fi Baby Monitor

iBaby Care M7 Wi-Fi

Editors' Choice Award

$159.96

(15% off)

at Amazon

See It

Wi-Fi Capable: Yes | Sound Activation: Yes

Extraordinary video quality

Loads of infant driven highlights

Simple to utilize

Remote controlled camera

Incorrect temperature sensor

Poor sound clearness

The iBaby Care M7 Wi-Fi is a great Wi-Fi video screen without equivalent in child particular highlights. This screen earned best scores for range, convenience, highlights, and battery existence with a second-put score for video quality. The iBaby's noteworthy execution amid testing and ensuing in general score brought about it winning an Editors' Choice honor for best Wi-Fi screen. This screen highlights mugginess, temperature, and air quality sensors to help guarantee child remains comfortable, and it accompanies children's songs, sleep time stories, and background noise. The iBaby is anything but difficult to utilize, has consistent with life pictures, and functions as it should. It offers sound actuation, movement location, 2-route converse with infant, and a remote control camera. The iBaby will keep on observing infant even with another application running, something the other wi-fi alternatives battle with.

iBaby M6S Wi-Fi

in the event that you are searching for a child focused camera that is marginally more affordable than the M7, the M6S is fundamentally the same as and simpler on the wallet. A past honor champ, this model is as yet being delivered and the distinctions in highlights are ones you likely won't miss.

This camera is more costly than a few of alternate choices making it a no-go if your financial plan is little. It additionally requires the web, and on the off chance that you have moderate or inferior administration, you won't have the capacity to utilize it. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you have the cash and need to see your little one with loads of cool, helpful infant focused highlights, it is hard, no, unimaginable, to discover something more reasonable than the iBaby.

Perused survey: iBaby Care M7 Wi-Fi

Best Dedicated Monitor

Philips Avent SCD630

Philips Avent SCD630 Editors' Choice Award

$154.03

(30% off)

at Amazon

See It

Wi-Fi Capable: No | Sound Activation: Yes

Best range for devoted screen

Speedy setup

Best stable

Higher cost

Manual camera change

Shorter battery life

The Philips Avent SCD630 is the number 1 positioned devoted screen in this survey. It has the longest range and most astounding convenience scores for the committed alternatives and the best score for sound clearness out of the considerable number of screens including wi-fi choices. The Philips accompanies children's songs, a nightlight, 2-route converse with infant, programmed screen wakeup/rest, sound actuation, 2x zoom, and a temperature sensor.

This screen battles to offer consistent with life pictures and has less highlights than the vast majority of the opposition, yet it is difficult to deny that this fitting and play screen is a straightforward answer for video child checking, and it takes care of business with little object and just a little expectation to learn and adapt. It is likewise costly for a video screen since a few committed and wi-fi choices have bring down sticker prices. Additionally, in the event that you need a remote-controlled camera, you should look somewhere else, as this one is manual with a littler field of view. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you aren't occupied with wi-fi however need a quality video choice, and you have the assets to spend, it is difficult to improve the situation than the Philips.

Perused survey: Philips Avent SCD630

Financial plan Friendly Wi-Fi

LeFun 1080p Wi-Fi

Best Value Award

$39.99

(29% off)

at Amazon

See It

Wi-Fi Capable: Yes | Sound Activation: Yes

Pleasant video quality

Remote controlled camera

Cheap

Slight differing slack time

Poor sound clearness

The LeFun 1080p Wi-Fi earned a third place rank on account of high scores for range and battery life, and great outcomes for video quality and highlights. This screen earned a Best Value for Wi-Fi screens at its financial plan neighborly rundown cost that is the minimum costly in the gathering; which implies you can get a best performing screen, at a sensible cost. The LeFun has movement identification, sound initiation, 2-route converse with child, zoom, and a remote-controlled camera with genuine container and tilt abilities.

This camera has a slack time when utilizing the container and tilt highlight, and it is somewhat harder to use than the other Wi-Fi choices we tried, yet given the low value, we presume most guardians will excuse these minor defects because of the great video pictures and cost any financial plan can manage.

Perused audit: LeFun 1080p Wi-Fi

Best Dedicated Monitor on a Budget

Levana Jena

Best Value Award

$79.99

at Amazon

See It

Wi-Fi Capable: No | Sound Activation: Yes

Simple to utilize

Great sound

Financial plan well disposed

Shorter range

So-so video

The Levana Jena is the high positioning committed screen with a financial plan benevolent cost. It accompanies great battery life and is anything but difficult to use with a larger number of highlights than past Levana models we've tried. This model has the second best solid clearness in the gathering and video adequate to perceive what you have to, regardless of whether it is feeling the loss of a portion of the points of interest or consistent with life hues. This screen has 2-route converse with child, sound enactment, and programmed screen wake/rest, which we feel are the absolute most critical highlights.

This screen has a shorter range than the Philips Avent SCD630 and less highlights, but at the same time it's about 33% of the cost too. So it may not be a decent decision for guardians with bigger homes or a separation between the nursery and the parent's room more noteworthy than four dividers. The Jena has no zoom, and the field of view is fairly little for a camera that isn't remotely worked. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you are searching for a devoted screen for the effortlessness and significant serenity with less possibility of a dropped flag, and your financial plan can't bolster different choices, at that point the Jena is difficult to beat.

Perused audit: Levana Jena

Incredible for Long-Term Use

Home Cam Indoor Wi-Fi

Top Pick Award

$158.00

(21% off)

at Amazon

See It

Wi-Fi Capable: Yes | Sound Activation: Yes

Consistent with life video

Simple to utilize

Highlights function admirably

Manual camera change

Poor sound clearness

The Nest Cam Indoor Wi-Fi tied with the iBaby Care M7 Wi-Fi. This screen has amazing video quality, wi-fi run, and is anything but difficult to use with enough highlights to keep most guardians cheerful. Its great execution helped it win the Top Pick grant for Long-term Use. The Nest Indoor is a cool observation camera you can use to watch your child, however given that the plan isn't particular to infant checking, it comes up short on a portion of the fun highlights guardians may need like bedtime songs and a nightlight. Be that as it may, it offers movement discovery, sound enactment, 2-path converse with infant, and 8x computerized zoom.

Home Cam IQ

Searching for a cool camera with considerably more highlights for security? The IQ has everything the Indoor offers and more with cutting edge highlights and Google aide. In the event that you intend to utilize this camera well past your infant watching days and need all that innovation brings to the table, you may investigate. Be forwarned, that while it scored well in tests, it has the biggest sticker price in the gathering and its extra highlights are not by any means helpful for infant checking.
The Nest Cam camera does not have a remote control, but rather depends on a substantial field of view you can zoom into and after that look. The drawback to this camera is it doesn't keep on checking in the event that you utilize another application or accept a telephone call making it difficult to utilize full-time without a second gadget. The Nest Cam is likewise costly (however not the most costly in the audit), but rather it is as yet less expensive than a portion of the committed screens. Particle the upside, its long haul utilize capacities make it a venture we figure guardians will use for quite a long time to come as a babysitter cam, home security include, or monitoring pets, in this way legitimizing the higher expense.

Perused audit: Nest Cam Indoor Wi-Fi

Investigation and Test Results

We tried and looked at 10 of the most famous video screens utilizing an exhaustive arrangement of tests more than a while. Our tests are intended to give the data you have to settle on an educated choice about which item is ideal for your family. Each screen is scored dependent on execution amid our hands-on, one next to the other testing. The test outcomes decide the metric scores, and those scores are utilized to make the general scores and rank. Metric scores originate from our in-house lab and client encounter "in the field." We weight the general scores with an inclination for the range, video quality, and sound lucidity.

We tried both Wi-Fi and committed screens from a few distinctive mainstream brands for our exhaustive video screen audit so you have all the data you have to settle on the best choice for your family.

We tried both Wi-Fi and devoted screens from a few diverse prominent brands for our exhaustive video screen audit, so you have all the data you have to settle on the best choice for your family.

Grant winning screens perform well and offer guardians and children the highlights they need or need. Video screens give a speedy and quiet investigate child's reality without leaving your comfortable bed or aggravating the infant.

In the event that a trek to the nursery is required, you haven't lost much time, however on the off chance that the infant is just changing, at that point you can return to rest without making a complain. Getting great rest, or however much rest as could be expected can be the contrast between an incredible infant experience and feeling like another parent/zombie disappointment.

Evening pictures on the iBaby are anything but difficult to see with clear pictures and consistent with life video.

Evening time pictures on the iBaby are anything but difficult to see with clear pictures and consistent with life video.

We test every item we buy in key measurements that enable them to work not surprisingly, or give an extra component or advantage. Screens go about as something of a life saver for guardians, so it is imperative that they function admirably, have sufficient range, give valuable pictures, and are anything but difficult to utilize. In the event that an item doesn't function admirably enough to ingrain certainty, at that point it will neglect to offer you the one thing you truly need, more rest.

Value versus Execution Comparison

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

Generally speaking Performance Score (better scores are to one side)

Cost $ (bring down is better)

Esteem Score (0-100 where 100 is best) Price

85.5 299

84 188

84 199

81 56

72 220

61.5 80

59.5 230

57.5 200

53.5 150

41.5 260

Esteem

Presently like never before, there are cool video checking choices that give quality without the goliath sticker price. With an assortment of choices available, including wi-fi empowered cameras, there is something for each family and each financial plan in this lineup of victors and high positioning items. Conceivably a standout amongst the most amazing decisions is the wi-fi Lefun 1080p with a cost beneath $60 you can get a cool screen you can utilize anyplace with wi-fi with great pictures and a direct UI. This alternative is incredible for families on a financial plan with bigger homes or in excess of four dividers between the nursery and the parent's room. While it has a slight deferral, it isn't sufficient to affect valuable child observing, and the absence of highlights is something we figure most guardians can acknowledge given the sensible cost. Not searching for wi-fi? The Levana Jena is a fundamental committed choice that works ideal out of the crate. Simply plug in this straightforward excellence, and you are prepared to watch your little one wheezing without end. The pictures on this screen aren't as fresh as more costly alternatives yet at the cost, it takes care of business, and you'll see and hear enough to know regardless of whether you ought to be on the rushed to your child's room amidst the night. With a rundown cost of $80, the Jena is more costly than the wi-fi Lefun, yet on the off chance that you would prefer not to upset innovation or your web is inadequate with regards to, it is the most elevated positioned, spending plan inviting devoted alternative in the gathering.

The Philips Avent SCD630 has the longest range in the survey for devoted screens. This screen figured out how to keep a reasonable flag with reliable association between 5 dividers at 92 ft. This makes it conceivably the main conceivable devoted screen for bigger homes.

The Philips Avent SCD630 has the longest range in the survey for committed screens. This screen figured out how to keep an unmistakable flag with predictable association between 5 dividers at 92 ft. This makes it conceivably the main conceivable devoted screen for bigger homes.

Range

The range is the separation and number of dividers between the nursery and the parent unit where the item will remain associated and working without intrusion or impedance. While most makers offer a "viewable pathway" range to portray their screens, this separation is certainly not a decent sign of how well it will function inside your home where dividers and obstruction flourish. It won't make any difference the amount you need a specific model or brand in the event that it doesn't remain associated in your home it just wouldn't work. We tried for indoor range and open field tests to give the most total picture. In any case, recall that the qualities inside your house could really compare to those in an open field except if obviously, you are disregarding an infant in an open field (which we don't prescribe).

Range Rating

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Care M7 Wi-Fi

LeFun 1080p Wi-Fi

Cam Indoor Wi-Fi

Cam IQ Indoor Wi-Fi

Avent SCD630

Motorola MBP36S

Levana Jena

DXR-8

Infant Pixel

Venture Nursery 4.3

10

10

10

10

9

8

6

5

5

3

Product Range Rating

Care M7 Wi-Fi 10

LeFun 1080p Wi-Fi 10

Cam Indoor Wi-Fi 10

Cam IQ Indoor Wi-Fi 10

Avent SCD630 9

Motorola MBP36S 8

Levana Jena 6

DXR-8 5

Infant Pixel 5

Venture Nursery 4.3 3

Bigger homes with more than 4 or 5 dividers between the camera and parent unit may be constrained to a Wi-Fi screen. The greater part of the committed screens just work through up to 4 dividers, with the exception of the Project Nursery 4.3 that quit working at 3. The Philips Avent SCD630 has the most expanded range for committed screens in this survey, with an amazing 92 ft through 5 dividers, so if your requirements are higher than that, at that point none of the devoted screens we tried are probably going to work for your circumstance. Wi-Fi associated cameras, then again, are constrained just by the remote switch area in connection to the camera and parent unit, and the quality and speed of your Wi-Fi association. In the event that essential, you can frequently move switches, or range extenders included, to expand the range between the parts if the Wi-Fi screen battles to keep an unmistakable or reliable association. Obtaining a screen from a retailer with a basic merchandise exchange (like Amazon) will enable you to test the screen in your home to decide how well it functions without the danger of being screwed over thanks to a pointless item.

Test Now

We prescribe you test your screen the day you get it; holding up could bring about missing an arrival window. Regardless of whether your little one hasn't arrived yet, you should set up the screen as it will be utilized and work with an accomplice or a radio to decide whether the association and highlights function as you trusted they would.

In the case of review on a vast or little screen the iBaby camera offers pleasant quality video with simple to see pictures and points of interest that stand separated from the dominant part of screens we tried. The pictures are so great it may be difficult to quit viewing!

In the case of survey on an expansive or little screen, the iBaby camera offers decent quality video with simple to see pictures and points of interest that stand separated from the greater part of screens we tried. The pictures are so great, it may be difficult to quit viewing!

Sound and Visual Quality

Screens ought to give video that is clear and consistent with life, yet they ought to likewise have quality sound that is anything but difficult to hear and clear enough for you to rapidly choose on the off chance that you have to take a gander at the review screen, return to rest, or get racing to the nursery. Along these lines, while you should seriously think about video quality to be the most vital metric for this sort of item, we appraised both video and sound similarly in light of the fact that, without one, the other doesn't much make a difference. On the off chance that it has muted sound, is hard to translate, or not sufficiently noisy, at that point guardians may miss child's cries. In the event that the sound initiation or edges for foundation clamor don't fill in as depicted, at that point guardians may lose rest tuning in to a noisy screen. Nonetheless, once cautioned, you require an unmistakable perspective of infant with enough points of interest to decide child's needs, day or night, or the video observing gadget isn't vastly improved than a sound just item.

The greater part of the screens we tried have normal sound quality and clearness that isn't excessively stifled or quieted. Most had splendid high solid without a considerable measure of mid-range or lower tones. This absence of tonal range isn't a major issue, yet it makes child's cries considerably harsher than they as of now are. 

The 2017 Humidifier Review

John holecek is a previous noaa specialist and has considered environmental material science and science in spots from the mainland us to the ice to the remote island country of the maldives. He is a long-lasting wirecutter teammate. For this guide, he climate fixed his home office and introduced a forced air system to keep up stable introductory conditions. He assessed the humidifiers with two convenient temperature and dampness information lumberjacks, and utilized a research center review molecule counter to survey the air washers (perused more by they way we tried).
SPT SU-9210 Digital Evaporative Humidifier

Tim heffernan is a wirecutter author and proofreader, and has directed broad true testing of air and water purifiers for our aides. For this guide, he tried nine humidifiers in his new york city flat amid the winter warming season, utilizing similar information lumberjacks.

This' identity for

in the event that you are pestered by any of the manifestations caused by dry air, for example, dry sinuses, nosebleeds, split and sore lips, or stuns from electricity produced via friction, the air in your house is likely excessively dry. In a large portion of the us, this is essentially a winter issue, particularly in homes with constrained air warming frameworks, which can drive indoor mugginess as low as 10 percent, making it actually desertlike. Be that as it may, dry air can likewise be an issue regardless of whether you have steam or under-floor warming, since chilly winter air for the most part has less dampness than warm summer air.

Utilizing a versatile humidifier, for example, the ones we looked into here, is the least expensive and most effortless approach to humidify your home without expecting to manage an air conditioning temporary worker. On the off chance that you get one, you should keep the relative dampness levels in your home somewhere close to 30 and 60 percent, which will reduce the indications recorded above while debilitating mold and buildup development in your home. In the event that you need to test your air before purchasing a humidifier, you can get a hygrometer on amazon for about $10.

In any case, humidifying your home includes something beyond purchasing a machine and keeping it loaded up with water. On the off chance that you don't take care to keep up your humidifier legitimately (see wellbeing dangers of a messy humidifier), it can accomplish more damage than anything else. Most humidifiers require customary upkeep, including an exhaustive cleaning at any rate once per week. There are special cases, similar to our redesign pick. In any case, be straightforward with yourself: would you say you are prepared to be a "humidifier parent"? In the event that you know you're not up for ordinary cleaning and upkeep, you may wind up with a rearing ground for germs.

How we picked

this is the fifth emphasis of this guide, so we went into it with extensive learning of what makes for a decent humidifier, as far as innovation and structure.

In all actuality, the greater part of the 21 machines we have tried throughout the years have performed enough—yet we've discovered gigantic contrasts in ergonomics, simplicity of cleaning and filling, nature of development, and UI. Since you for the most part need to cooperate with a humidifier day by day—to refill the tank, here and there more than once, and afterward restart and reset it—these variables dependably weigh intensely in our decision of which machines to pick for testing.

So do proprietor audits and other analyzers' discoveries. So as usual, this time around we inquired about famous models on amazon (focusing on both positive and negative surveys), counseled allergybuyersclub.com, top ten audits, consumersearch, and best purchase, and read the remarks from our past guide for input and proposals from our perusers.

We concentrated on versatile humidifiers since you can without much of a stretch add one to any home or loft and move it around as required. We confined our pursuit to models appraised to cover somewhere in the range of 200 and 700 square feet: the low end of that scale is all that anyone could need inclusion for a normal room (which is principally where these machines see utilize), and the top of the line is bounty for even the biggest open spaces in many homes. In spite of the fact that you can discover extensive support units hypothetically equipped for humidifying a whole home, the mugginess levels will shift significantly with separation from the machine and space to room (even with every one of the entryways open, which isn't constantly functional), so we think having a couple of, littler humidifiers is the better alternative.

Versatile humidifiers don't take up a great deal of room. Left to right: venta lw25, honeywell hcm-350, spt su-9210, and levoit lv600hh. Photo: michael hession

we to a great extent constrained our pursuit to the two most basic sorts of convenient humidifier. They both utilize basic, demonstrated, powerful instruments, and are to a great degree vitality effective.

Ultrasonic humidifiers utilize a quickly vibrating stomach to dispatch minute beads of water into the air, where they rapidly dissipate and progressed toward becoming water vapor—the wellspring of moistness. These machines are for the most part tranquil (however they do emanate a capable of being heard, mechanical murmur), and cleaning them is straightforward, commonly a matter of washing the tank and wiping down the internals each couple of days or week after week.

Be that as it may, in light of the fact that they toss fluid water (not vaporous water vapor) into the air, minerals in the water can settle on encompassing surfaces as a fine white residue as the fog dissipates. Likewise, ultrasonic humidifiers must remain over a dresser, table, or retire: the beads require a touch of time to vanish as they fall descending, or they will puddle on the floor.

Ultrasonic models can likewise overhumidify the air in a room, to the point that dampness consolidates on floors, carpets, and furniture close to the machine. What's more, in the long haul, overhumidification can advance the development of shape and mold in homes. Thus, we vigorously supported ultrasonic models with inherent humidistats, which stop the machine when the air achieves the coveted moistness.

In conclusion, if there's no water in the tank to ingest the vibrations of the stomach, ultrasonic humidifiers can really break themselves—so we took a gander at models that had an auto-off when the tank ran dry.

Evaporative humidifiers utilize the characteristic procedure of dissipation to add dampness to the air. A fan draws air through a wet wick or channel, humidifying it before blowing it pull out into the room. This procedure has the huge preferred standpoint of naturally anticipating overhumidification: the evaporative procedure moderates as the air gets wetter. That implies evaporative humidifiers won't deliver buildup on floors and different surfaces and are probably not going to make conditions that advance shape and mold.

In addition, the evaporative procedure implies any minerals in the water supply remain behind on the wick—so there's no issue of white residue. Mechanically, evaporative humidifiers are powerful and for all intents and purposes failproof: they're basically room fans—and they discharge the equivalent, delicate "background noise" numerous individuals find mitigating. At last, they can work without causing themselves any harm regardless of whether the tank runs dry.

Support of evaporative models, notwithstanding, is somewhat fussier than for ultrasonic plans: the wicks require standard supplanting (each one to three months) as they stop up with minerals, and in light of the fact that the wet wicks can conceivably be a rearing ground for shape and microorganisms, you truly need to complete a careful cleaning of the tank and internals in any event once per week. We supported models that made these assignments simple and modest.

We likewise thought to be two different kinds of humidifier. Warm-fog humidifiers work by warming water into steam. As you may figure, this methodology isn't awfully vitality effective, and the hot parts may show a consume hazard. Notwithstanding, a few people like the slight warmth that these models add to the air, so we tried a couple of prominent models. Impeller humidifiers utilize a quickly turning circle to excursion water against a diffuser plate that breaks the beads into fine fog. They are calm, yet like the ultrasonic models they can create a white residue. The dampness yield is low, and the client evaluations we've seen on amazon are bad to the point that we've skipped impeller humidifiers totally in our testing.

After five emphasess of this guide, we have put 70 distinctive humidifiers on our short rundown and tried 21. On the off chance that you'd jump at the chance to see our test plan in detail, it's in a lower segment called how we tried—that material regularly shows up now in a wirecutter survey, however it's so broad in this guide we moved it after the exchange of our picks.

Our pick: honeywell hcm-350

a nearby of our single out the floor.

Photograph: michael hession

our pick

honeywell hcm-350 without germ cool fog humidifier

honeywell hcm-350 without germ cool fog humidifier

the best humidifier

straightforward, solid, profoundly viable, and less demanding to clean than some other humidifier we've tried, the hcm-350 has been our most loved for quite a long time.

$55* from amazon

$56 from walmart

*at the season of distributing, the cost was $65.

The honeywell hcm-350 germ free cool fog humidifier has been our pick since 2015. It's moderate, basic, tough, and profoundly viable—in a certifiable test in a dry, steam-warmed new york city condo, it raised the mugginess by right around 25 percent, turning in one of the specific best exhibitions we gauged. Yet, similarly essential, it's additionally amazingly simple to live with. It's conservative, and it can sit on the floor or on a table or retire. It produces no splendid light or boisterous signals to keep you up around evening time. Furthermore, it runs unobtrusively, making just a delicate "repetitive sound," a room fan. In addition, it's the least demanding humidifier to clean and fill we've ever discovered—the significant parts are dishwasher-safe—which is important, since those are the two undertakings you'll be doing regularly with any humidifier. Evaluated for spaces as substantial as 400 square feet, it's sufficiently enormous to humidify any room or front room. As of winter 2018, we've set it against 20 contenders, and no less than eight wirecutter editors have utilized one long haul in their very own homes, it's still effortlessly our accord champ.

The honeywell hcm-350 plays out the most imperative undertaking of a humidifier—raising the measure of dampness noticeable all around—astoundingly well. In our true new york city loft test, it raised the mugginess by 23.5 percent, from an uneasily dry 26 percent to a wonderful 49.5 percent. That put it inside an immaterial 1.5 purposes of the plain best entertainer, and comfortable epa's suggested "sweet spot" of 50 percent (helpful for skin and respiratory-tract dryness, however beneath the level that supports form and buildup). Also, the honeywell humidified the air rapidly, beating all our different picks over the initial two hours of the test. On the off chance that you returned home to a dry house or condo, the honeywell will make it agreeable soon. Enthusiastically, these outcomes likewise accord with the discoveries of our prior tests under controlled conditions (perceive how we tried for subtle elements).

The honeywell emerges for other, similarly critical reasons. Since it's an evaporative humidifier, it discharges vaporous water vapor, which implies there is no danger of it making puddles on your floor. Dissipation likewise leaves any minerals in the water behind, so you won't see a layer of white residue around the machine. (both of these worries are a potential issue with ultrasonic humidifiers, including our pick for substantial spaces, the levoit lv600hh, in light of the fact that those plans toss a fog of fluid water into the air rather than water vapor.) this implies the honeywell offers maximal choices for arrangement: it can sit on the floor, behind a household item, or on a table or retire. Ultrasonic models are more constrained, as they need to live on a table or retire to sufficiently enable time for the fog to dissipate before it falls onto a surface and makes a puddle. Also, on the grounds that the evaporative procedure backs off the more sticky the air gets, the hcm-350 is automatic: it can't overhumidify a room the way ultrasonic models, which constantly direct water into the air, can.

Contrasted and our sprinter up evaporative humidifier, the practically comparable spt su-9210, the honeywell hcm-350 has various astute plan components that make it substantially less demanding and more lovely to utilize. Take the water tank: the honeywell's sits level and stable on its best, taking into account sans hands filling (see the video underneath). The spt's tank shakes and wobbles, so you need to hold it while it fills. What's more, take a gander at the top on the honeywell's tank—that "crossbar" enables you to get an extremely firm grasp when opening or shutting it. No other machine we tried has this element; rather, they offer just edges around the top edge that get elusive when wet. (the other top in our photograph has a place with our ultrasonic pick, the levoit lv600hh. The spt su-9210's is much the equivalent.)

humidifiers-lowres-9893

super-basic controls and a solitary minor light make the honeywell room neighborly. Photograph: michael hession

humidifiers-lowres-9897

the honeywell hcm-350's tank sits upstanding, giving you a chance to do different things while it's topping off at the tap. Photograph: michael hession

humidifiers-lowres-9901

the honeywell's tank top (left) has a crossbar that capacities as a hold. It's simpler to open and close than run of the mill tops, (for example, the levoit lv600hh top, right), whose smooth edges are tricky when wet. Photo: michael hession

humidifiers-lowres-9893

super-basic controls and a solitary minor light make the honeywell room well disposed. Photograph: michael hession

humidifiers-lowres-9897

the honeywell hcm-350's tank sits upstanding, giving you a chance to do different things while it's topping off at the tap. Photograph: michael hession

1 of 3

the honeywell's controls couldn't be less difficult: it has only an essential flip like that of a room fan, with off/high/medium/low symbols. You can without much of a stretch modify the settings even in obscurity, which is helpful if, as is normal, you intend to utilize a humidifier in the room. The spt show has four separate catches for setting fan speed, the humidistat, and the clock, and they're not illuminated, so they're somewhat dubious to use in obscurity. They likewise blare noisily with each push—baffling in a tranquil room or an infant's nursery. The honeywell's flip is quiet. What's more, the spt's blue driven presentation and red power light shine splendidly—enough to impede rest—and can't be killed while the machine is connected (not simply while it's on). The honeywell has a solitary, little, unpretentious green globule to tell you it's running.

The hcm-350's simplicity of cleaning is far superior than that of numerous contenders, starting with the way that every one of the parts that touch water (and are accordingly subject to amass bacterial, algal, or contagious development) contain no hardware and are totally submersible in water for simple washing. The fill gap of the tank is sufficiently substantial for nearly anybody to reach inside for scouring (that is 6-foot-1 author tim heffernan's turn in the photograph beneath). What's more, both the tank and the water plate are dishwasher safe (top rack just, no cleanser). This is the manner by which it ought to be. However the hcm-350 stands as an unmistakable difference to numerous humidifier models we've taken a gander at, which contain hardware in the base and expect you to clean them by hand. (its most comparative rival in our test, the spt su-9210, gives you a chance to clean the plate, however not the tank, in the dishwasher.)

cleaning the honeywell takes just a few minutes, on account of keen plan that makes each progression simple.

Since evaporative humidifiers utilize a fan to blow air over the moist wick, they make a little measure of clamor—however it's an unbiased, notwithstanding quieting, repetitive sound couple of individuals find questionable. In the event that you like the sound of a room fan, you'll be content with the honeywell. (wirecutter planner orr shtuhl, who lives in new york city, stated, "one thing I for one like is that the two lower settings are peaceful, and the most grounded setting is sufficiently noisy to be utilized for repetitive sound—jump at the chance to shut out road clamor during the evening.") we quantified its sound level on high at 48.9 decibels from a separation of 1 meter; that is well under the 55 decibels it takes to start meddling with a run of the mill discussion. The clamor drops to a scarcely discernible 40.3 decibels in the event that you set the fan speed to medium. That is practically identical to the sound from numerous ultrasonic models, which are regularly charged as "quiet"— however which do, truth be told, deliver a mechanical murmur that commotion touchy individuals may discover less wonderful than the background noise the honeywell.

A photograph demonstrating that it's anything but difficult to venture into the water tank of the honeywell humidifier.

Indeed, even huge hands can fit inside the honeywell's tank, making it simple to thoroughly clean. Photograph: michael hession

at last, for a few wirecutter editors and scholars who claim the honeywell, this model has demonstrated to a great degree sturdy over the long haul. Mechanically it's exceptionally straightforward, which means it has next to no inside that can break. Also, the tank is blow-formed from a solitary, consistent bit of plastic (like a drain container). The one-piece configuration is significantly less liable to create spills after some time than the two-piece (or more) melded plastic structures found on numerous different models, including two of our different picks, the spt su-9210 and levoit lv600hh, in light of the fact that it doesn't have any creases that can fall to pieces. It will probably outlive its three-year guarantee—which is as of now liberal contrasted and most models' one-year guarantees—and none of our staff members have ever had an issue with it.

Counting the price tag, the expense of new channels, and the expense of power, the honeywell hcm-350 will set you back about $250 through the span of its three-year expected administration life (accepting you're running it 24 hours per day, a half year of the year—you may well run it far less). That is on the low end of machines we've taken a gander at.

Blemishes however not dealbreakers

at 1 gallon, the hcm-350's tank is on the little side; on the off chance that you run it day in and day out, you'll refill it at any rate once. Bigger tanks can bolster an entire 24 hours of activity.

In a plan characteristic normal to evaporative humidifiers, the base plate of the honeywell doesn't physically join to the upper lodging, where the fan and tank are found; the last just lays on the previous. In the event that you have to move the unit, you need to achieve the distance to the floor and get your fingers under the plate—else you'll desert it.

Honeywell substitution wicking humidifier channel hac-504a (channel a)

honeywell substitution wicking humidifier channel hac-504a (channel a)

the substitution channel

you'll require another channel at regular intervals at least, and all the more frequently if your water is hard.

$15* from walmart

$10 from amazon

*at the season of distributing, the cost was $10.

Substitution channels are a basic drop-in issue. What's more, honeywell-made channels (versus outsider channels) are impregnated with an antimicrobial complete that, the organization claims, for all intents and purposes disposes of form and microscopic organisms development. In any case, contingent upon the hardness of your water, honeywell prescribes supplanting the channel each one to three months. It's typical for the channel to turn darker or vile as the mineral stores develop, and you can expand the life of the channel by flipping it start to finish each time you refill the tank or flush out the base. In any case, when the channel ends up soaked with minerals, the wicking capacity is obstructed, bringing about a drop-off in humidifying capacity (and water utilization). So on the off chance that you see that there's more water left in the tank than you anticipate that when you go will refill it, it's likely time to supplant or clean the channel.

In january 2016 we explored a few grievances from perusers about swap channels for the honeywell hcm-350. The grievances noted poor fit and expressed that the substitutions were more slender than the firsts, appeared to be unique, or did not perform agreeably. We talked finally with a delegate of kaz, the maker of the hcm-350. Notwithstanding noting our inquiries, the agent sent photos and a physical example of the current-issue substitution channel. We likewise freely requested a substitution channel from amazon to make sure we were getting a similar model that our perusers would. This is what we realized:

kaz, the maker of the honeywell humidifier, changed from a 1½-inch-thick channel to a ¾-inch-thick channel around 2011. On the off chance that anybody as of late got a humidifier with a 1½-inch-thick channel, it was (extremely) old stock.

Kaz eliminated the external blue airwash layer on the ¾-inch channels in 2014. The airwash channel decreased the humidifiers' yield. Other than this change, the channels are indistinguishable.

The substitution channels that kaz sent us, the substitution we got from amazon, and the first that we hauled out of our test demonstrate were all indistinguishable. The substitutions we got from kaz and from amazon both fit our hcm-350 humidifier splendidly.

Kaz offers a similar substitution channel under two distinct names, the honeywell channel an and the honeywell hac-504 arrangement; they are indistinguishable. (the most recent form in the arrangement, refreshed for expanded effectiveness, is the hac-504v1.) some outsider makers additionally offer substitution channels that they portray as "hac-504 good," yet honeywell can't vouch for these channels' execution. Our connection is to a honest to goodness honeywell hac-504v1. Or on the other hand, to be sure beyond a shadow of a doubt, you can arrange straightforwardly from the producer.

Long haul test notes

wirecutter's michael zhao and kevin purdy have each utilized a honeywell hcm-350 for a few winters.

Michael, who lives in a radiator-warmed new york city condo and utilizations the honeywell in the room, stated, "it's so natural to clean that I in reality clean it. Which is entirely extraordinary." cleaning is extremely imperative—and simplicity of cleaning is one of our primary purposes behind suggesting the hcm-350. Michael included, "it's irritating that the fan gathers dust, yet i've discovered that the defensive screen falls off neatly on the off chance that you give it a decent pull with needle-nose forceps." that enables him to wipe the fan off (and reinstall the screen) absent much object. In the wake of moving from a flat with a standard 8-foot roof to one with 12-foot roofs—a major bounce in volume however not territory, as the two rooms are around 150 square feet—michael noticed an evident drop-off in supreme humidification yet in addition saw that the unit was as yet successful at lessening the side effects of dry air, for example, waking with a dry throat. Moreover, he possesses a feline, and he has discovered that the wick gathers pet hair; a week by week vacuuming (a two-minute occupation) clears that up.

Kevin and his significant other live in a constrained air-warmed victorian house in wild ox, new york; it gets extremely dry in the winter, and they likewise utilize their honeywell hcm-350 in the room. Kevin confesses to being "an enemy of despondent person" and "on the extreme left end of support," which means he doesn't spotless his unit with any feeling of desperation. He has for the most part given the honeywell's repository a scour with dish cleanser once every week, and not cleaned the base plate or the channel with any normality. He additionally has given water a chance to sit in the supply for quite a long time at any given moment. He includes: "I have not had anything terrible transpire." fine, but rather truly, he ought to pursue maker rules for any humidifier, or else hazard genuine sickness; on account of the honeywell, that support incorporates a week by week scour of the tank and plate and a washing of the wick. With respect to the hcm-350's execution, kevin stated: "it works extremely well, and it doesn't look horrendously appalling in our room. It covers up in a corner and does the activity."

sprinter up: spt su-9210

our sprinter up pick sitting on the floor.

Photograph: michael hession

sprinter up

spt su-9210 computerized evaporative humidifier

spt su-9210 computerized evaporative humidifier

comparative, with a few imperfections

the spt su-9210 executes and also our best pick, yet a couple of tragic structure choices make it far less simple to live with.

$55* from home warehouse

$60 from walmart

*at the season of distributing, the cost was $66.

In the event that the honeywell hcm-350 is out of stock, consider the spt su-9210 computerized evaporative humidifier, which additionally performed to a great degree well in our testing. As an evaporative humidifier, the su-9210 has indistinguishable intrinsic advantages over ultrasonic models from the hcm-350: an absence of white residue and puddling, and a general powerlessness to overhumidify. What's more, it has various highlights that a few people may acknowledge and that the honeywell needs, including an exact humidistat and a clock mode. Be that as it may, it's not so natural to spotless as our best pick and has various goading configuration imperfections, which eventually make it substantially more hard to live with. We can prescribe it just if the honeywell is absolutely inaccessible and you require a humidifier instantly.

To the extent quantitative testing goes, the spt display performed exceptionally well, scoring (like every one of our picks) at the highest point of our certifiable tests in a dry, steam-warmed new york condo. When we tried the humidistat's precision, it nailed the 55 percent target (perceive how we tried for finish test results). Its assessed working expense of about $200 makes it about $40 less expensive than the honeywell through the span of three years.

Be that as it may, the su-9210 gives a fundamentally more regrettable in general understanding. The hand-wash-just tank is made of a few plastic pieces combined, and we stress over it spilling after some time. It likewise will in general tip over while you're filling it, so you need to remain there holding it consistent. The spt's showcase is splendidly lit and can never be stopped, making it difficult to use in a room or nursery, and it additionally blares uproariously upon each catch push, which exacerbates the issue.

In the event that the honeywell hcm-350 is sold out and you require an evaporative humidifier instantly or incidentally, the spt su-9210 is an adequate substitute. For long haul decency, in any case, the honeywell is a greatly improved decision.

Overhaul pick: levoit lv600hh

our overhaul pick sitting on a side table.

Photograph: michael hession

overhaul pick

levoit lv600hh half breed ultrasonic humidifier

levoit lv600hh half breed ultrasonic humidifier

ultrasonic, ultra execution

a tremendous tank, elite, and mindful structure make this levoit show our new pick for requesting spaces.

$85* from amazon

*at the season of distributing, the cost was $77.

The levoit lv600hh cross breed ultrasonic humidifier is a perfectly structured, intense ultrasonic humidifier, and it's our pick for expansive spaces (like a living room– lounge area) and particularly dry homes (wood-warmed or constrained air). Its 6-liter/1.5-gallon tank can go for over 24 hours between refills, which means less treks to the sink (we got 27 hours, on medium, running relentless, in a steam-warmed new york city condo). Its exact humidistat keeps up the stickiness at your coveted level. Furthermore, it's anything but difficult to live with: it's calm, cleaning the tank is straightforward, and, in an attentive touch, the lit showcase can be stopped—so it won't upset anybody's rest. Among its drawbacks—likewise with all ultrasonic humidifiers—it needs to remain over the floor to limit the danger of puddling, and it can make a layer of white residue on surfaces if your water supply contains a great deal of minerals. What's more, its base unit is fussier to clean than it should be, attributable to a plan with bunches of alcoves and crevices. By and large, the levoit is an outstanding humidifier, yet it's more ground-breaking than a great many people need, and it's normally more costly than our best pick.

The levoit reliably set at or close to the best in our certifiable test in by and large humidification (perceive how we tried), and its humidistat, not at all like on numerous models we have tried, demonstrated precise, following inside five points of what the information lumberjacks enrolled. That implies you can set an objective mugginess and the machine will turn itself on and off to keep the air at that level. So, we don't consider a humidistat essential on each humidifier—evaporative models, similar to the best pick honeywell hcm-350, normally balance out the mugginess at an agreeable level.

The levoit's vast tank (1.5 gallons) implies the machine can keep running for quite a while between refills—levoit claims 30 or more hours, and we got 27 hours with the machine running constantly on medium. Our best pick, the honeywell, with a 1-gallon tank, commonly requires somewhere around one refill amid a 24-hour time frame. Joined with the ground-breaking ultrasonic system, this tank limit settles on the levoit a superior decision for huge rooms or extremely dry homes; for the most part, wood-warmed and constrained air-warmed homes are drier than those with steam warm.

We extremely valued various plan includes on the levoit, for example, a tank that lies level while you're filling it (giving you a chance to accomplish something unique meanwhile—a 1.5-gallon tank requires a significant stretch of time to top up). The tank's fill opening is likewise sufficiently vast that you can reach inside for an exhaustive cleaning. 

Checkout The Portable Jump Starter

I’ve covered electrical products for Wirecutter for more than two years, writing guides to the best surge protectors, uninterruptible power supplies, and USB battery packs. I’ve regularly used a portable jump starter over the past couple of years, ever since we first picked one for our “Best Gear for Your Road Trip” guide. In addition to using a portable jump starter to help stranded strangers every few months, in one six-month stretch I made it my weapon of choice in a war against a very persistent electrical gremlin in my vintage VW Karmann Ghia.
PowerAll Deluxe PBJS12000-R

For this guide, I reviewed the ratings and reviews from experts such as Consumer Reports (subscription required) and CNET, as well as owner reviews (taking them with a grain of salt, as always), to find the best-regarded and most popular portable jump starters. Finding relatively little data and few up-to-date comparative reviews, however, I developed my own tests to size up the various models. I also consulted about my tests and results with Lee Johnson, an electrical engineer who has extensive experience with lithium batteries.

Who this is for
Anyone with a car can benefit from a portable jump starter, because, well, stuff happens. An interior light left on all night, a radio running when you sneak out to your car for a lunch-break nap, or freezing temperatures in the middle of winter can all drain a battery’s charge in many vehicles. You can run down even newer batteries and newer cars. And because the ignition systems in today’s cars are so efficient, you won’t necessarily get a warning—such as the engine cranking more slowly—before it happens. At best, a drained battery is an inconvenience; in the wrong place or at the wrong time, it can be also a safety concern.


If your car won’t start because of a dead battery, having a portable jump starter handy can put you back on the road a lot more quickly than getting a jump from another car or waiting for roadside assistance—and you’re not dependent on finding an available friend or Good Samaritan to help you out. Video: Kyle Fitzgerald.
Jumper cables have long been the standard option for dealing with a dead battery. But even if you have a set handy, you still need to call a friend or relative and wait for them to rescue you—or you need to find a stranger who’s willing and able to park their car nearby and give your vehicle a jump. Moreover, many people are uncomfortable using cables, afraid that they’ll hook them up wrong and cause a problem. Doing so can produce an electrical short that fries a car’s computers, or sparks that can even cause a battery to explode. Calling for roadside assistance is another option, especially if you’re in real trouble or need a tow, and some services will even deliver a fresh battery if yours is beyond salvaging, but if all you need is a quick jump start, waiting for a tech can be maddening. A portable jump starter solves all these problems.

Because the ignition systems in today’s cars are so efficient, you may not get a warning before finding out your car’s battery is run down.

Because a jump starter has its own battery, you simply connect the jump starter’s two cable clamps to the appropriate battery terminals on your car, flip a switch, and crank the engine. You can be on your way again in minutes. Many models have enough power to let you do this several times before you need to recharge the jump starter itself. And the better ones instantly sense if you’ve hooked up the cables wrong, and give you a clear warning.

Although jump starters have long been large and heavy, containing their own lead-acid battery, in the past few years a new wave of small, lightweight, lithium-ion jump packs have appeared that easily fit in a car’s glove box, making them much easier to keep with you for an emergency. Those are the models we researched and tested for this guide.

Portable jump starters offer a benefit for other drivers, too—having one can turn you into a roadside superhero. They’re so easy to use, and so quick to set up, that you can help a stranger in just a couple of minutes without moving your car. If you ditch the jumper cables and keep one of our picks handy instead, you may be surprised how often you come across folks with dead batteries and how easy it is to save their day. That isn’t something you can say about a lot of purchases. (And our picks take up a lot less space in your car than jumper cables!)

You can be on your way in minutes, and the better jump starters sense if you’ve hooked up the cables wrong.

Today’s lithium-ion jump starters don’t require as much maintenance as their larger lead-acid counterparts, but you do need to charge them periodically to get the most out of them. PowerAll says that its models—including the PowerAll Deluxe, one of our picks—can retain about 50 percent of their rated capacity for up to a year, but the company recommends that they be fully charged every three to six months.

While you can usually stow a portable jump starter in your car for emergencies, you shouldn’t leave one in direct sunlight. And keep in mind that on very hot days the temperature of a car’s interior can rise above the operational temperature range of a typical jump starter. PowerAll, for example, says its models can operate between -20 degrees and 140 degrees Fahrenheit, and should never be allowed to get above about 175 degrees. On hot summer days, it’s better to keep a jump starter in the trunk, rather than inside the car’s cabin. That said, the jump starters from both Weego and PowerAll have thermal sensors that will prevent use if the temperature is too high. If that happens, let the device cool down before trying to jump a car.

Having a jump starter can turn you into a roadside superhero. You can help a stranger in a couple of minutes without moving your car.

On the other hand, drivers in cold climates might also worry about the weather’s impact on a jump starter’s performance. It’s a real concern, because, just as below-freezing temperatures are hard on your car’s battery, they can also affect a lithium battery’s ability to deliver a full charge. That doesn’t mean you’re out of luck, though. If you can’t start your car even with your jump starter attached, unhook the device and warm it up for a few minutes—take it inside, or even just sit on it. A slight temp increase can have a big impact on the available power.

What makes a good jump starter
When you’re shopping for a portable jump starter, you’ll encounter lots of specs and features. Here are the things that are most important, as well as a couple of features that we don’t consider critical.

Starting power: The power that a portable jump starter can deliver to your engine is the most important factor. And like a car battery, a jump starter is generally rated by cold cranking amps (CCA) or sometimes peak amps (PA). But that doesn’t mean you can easily figure out what types of vehicles a given model is actually capable of starting. Some manufacturers make only a general claim about what engine size their model can start, such as a V8 or a 4.0 L. Generally, the bigger the engine, the more battery power it needs to start, and you’ll find a huge range of power outputs for car batteries and jump starters alike.

All of our picks are good choices for most passenger vehicles on the road.

Jump starters made for the smaller engines in sedans and compact cars can be rated as low as 150 CCA, while models designed for larger SUVs and trucks can claim up to 450 CCA. But things aren’t always that simple. The amount of power you need also depends on the state of the battery and when the vehicle was designed and built. As Lee Johnson, our consulting engineer, pointed out, when you’re comparing vehicles of a similar size, older models will likely need more power than newer ones. Newer trucks “have come a long way from my old Suburban starter, efficiency-wise,” he said. In general, the newer starter motors and engine designs in more recent car models will need less of a kick to get going, so keep that in mind if you have a 20-year-old beast in the garage.

A hand plugging the clip of a portable jump starter onto a car battery.
The inline box on a jump starter’s cables houses some of the safety circuits and shows error and status lights. In the case of our picks, it makes an audible alarm if you connect the device incorrectly. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
Safety features: While most jump starters have a suite of safety circuits to prevent sending more current or voltage than they’re designed to handle, reverse-polarity protection is what makes them notably easier to use, especially for people who are concerned about getting the connections wrong. And that’s no small concern. When you hook up a jump starter to your battery, you need to connect the positive (+) clamp to the positive post, and then attach the negative (-) clamp to the negative post. If you confuse them and connect positive to negative and vice versa without that protection, you’ll get sparks at the connection and potentially damage your car’s battery or electrical system. But the reverse-polarity protection built into each of the jump starters we tested confirms that each clamp is on the correct post before completing the circuit. If you screw up, you’ll get an alert and a chance to try again. Some jump-start packs have only a small error light to warn you of a reverse connection, but the best ones, including our picks, have both a light and an audible alarm that you won’t miss.

As a general safety note, you typically don’t need to worry about dropping a portable jump starter, but as it has a stack of lithium battery cells inside, you shouldn’t pierce or crush it. If you do manage to seriously dent the housing, you’ll need to replace the device.

Reverse-polarity protection makes jump starters easier to use for people who are concerned about getting the connections wrong.

Clamps, cables, and build quality: A jump starter’s clamps can be a make-or-break feature, and a surprising number of manufacturers are using the same cheap clamp design, one that appears to come from a single supplier. A good set of clamps opens wide enough to make a solid connection on any size battery post, without any twisting or bending. While most clamps are secured to the cables with a simple crimp fitting, the best ones are either soldered or screwed down to add extra durability.

portable-jump-starters-fullres-2633
The cables and clamps shown here are matched to the positions of their respective packs in the previous photo. Seven were very similar; three of them were identical. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

portable-jump-starters-fullres-2622
The size and weight of the models from the nine brands we tried were relatively similar, but we saw big differences in the better cables and clamps (shown in the next photo). Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

portable-jump-starters-fullres-2633
The cables and clamps shown here are matched to the positions of their respective packs in the previous photo. Seven were very similar; three of them were identical. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

portable-jump-starters-fullres-2622
The size and weight of the models from the nine brands we tried were relatively similar, but we saw big differences in the better cables and clamps (shown in the next photo). Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald

1 of 2
A unit’s two cables are fixed to one another, and you plug them into the battery pack when you need them. Thicker cables are rated to deliver more power, and may indicate a more durable device in general, but we didn’t see much variation in the models we considered; most of them used 10 AWG wire, while a few used slightly thicker 8 AWG wire. If the plug that goes into the jump starter has a large box with status lights and safety circuitry, handling the whole contraption and finding a place to rest the device in your engine bay can be a little awkward. The best designs put these small boxes inline on the cables, where they are less likely to be in the way.

A jump starter’s clamps can be a make-or-break feature.

Because the connection port for the jumper cables is generally larger than other power ports, it is almost always covered to guard against dust and moisture. But some seal better than others. Covers that seal tightly, and those that cover all the ports, make for a more durable device. Since jump starters are electronics meant for use near oily engines in any weather condition, we consider even these relatively minor touches to be important to the devices’ longevity.

We wouldn’t consider models from any brand without easily accessible support information.

Warranty and service: A lot can go wrong with a high-output battery pack like this. Most of the jumper packs we researched are made by reputable companies in either the auto industry or the consumer electronics industry. All the models we tested have at least a one-year warranty and come from companies that stand behind their products and are reachable by phone or email if you have any problems. Warranties longer than a year are uncommon but not unheard of. We wouldn’t consider models from any brand without easily accessible support information. Because the quality of internal lithium battery cells can vary considerably, and because jump starters need to channel a lot of power all at once, it’s important that a manufacturer is confident enough in its components and design to remain available if problems arise.

Every reputable company builds enough capacity into its packs for you to perform a handful of starts.

Capacity: Many companies brag about the overall capacity of their jump starters, which they generally list in mAh (milliamp hours) just as the makers of USB battery packs do. But this is a pretty pointless metric when you’re shopping for a jump starter. Capacity doesn’t directly affect how large an engine a model can start or how dead of a battery it can fill in for; the measurement reflects only how many times the device can perform a start. Every reputable company builds enough capacity into its packs for you to perform a handful of starts—enough to get you started a couple of times in case you need to pull over on your way home or on your way to a shop or auto-parts store. You shouldn’t really need more than that, since you can just recharge it after you use it. When we checked with Lee Johnson, our electrical engineer, about overall power consumption, we found that even our huge Ram 1500 pickup truck required only about 0.25 Ah, or 250 mAh, to start its engine.1 Since the smallest jump-starter capacity we considered was 6,000 mAh, we’re not concerned about capacity even with very conservative estimates.

A hand holding the charging cables for some portable jump starters.
Maybe they’ll come in handy, but the charger tips and cables included with some jump starters can be mostly clutter if you don’t use them. We didn’t consider them important when choosing our picks. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
Accessory cables: Each jump starter can also work to power and recharge personal electronics such as phones, tablets, portable music players, and laptops; many come with extra cables and tips (Micro-USB, Mini-USB, 30-pin, Lightning, and so on) for connecting those devices. Although such items may be a perk, in choosing our picks we didn’t consider them to be as important as the features that make a jump starter safe, effective, and easy to use. If you’re concerned about charging personal electronics and don’t have an appropriate port in your vehicle, we suggest getting a USB battery pack or a USB car charger so you can keep your jump starter at full strength for an emergency.

How we tested
A number of portable jump starters balanced on the front of a car.
We measured how top models performed on three different engines, while evaluating their safety features, clamp construction, and overall build quality. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
To find the best portable jump starters, we considered the output and capacity claims of 40 of the most popular and well-reviewed models available. For the first version of this guide, published in spring 2017, we chose nine of the most promising ones to test based on their brand reputation, their claimed ability to start at least a midsize SUV, their price, and their reviews. Out of curiosity, we also chose to test a jump starter with an optional solar-charging battery pack. For that initial group, we conducted two different vehicle-starting tests, as well as a safety test that focused on what would happen if we connected a unit’s cables improperly. For the latest update, we tested two new models—the Weego 22s and the PowerAll XL1—on a different vehicle. For both rounds of testing, we also compared how easy each model was to use and evaluated the quality of the clamps, cables, overall construction, and accessories of each contender.

Power measurements when jump-starting our Jeep Wrangler
SUV
0
50
100
150
200
Weego Jump
Starter 44
Anker Compact Car
Jump Starter and
Portable Charger
Bolt Power D28A
Brightech Scorpion
SCP02
Beüler Solar
Battery Power Pack
Schumacher Red
Fuel SL161
Amps delivered
Jump starter Amps delivered Amps delivered
Weego Jump Starter 44 0 184.8
PowerAll Supreme PBJS16000-RS 0 151.1
Anker Compact Car Jump Starter and Portable Charger 217.6 0
Antigravity Batteries Micro-Start XP-10 212.2 0
Bolt Power D28A 211.5 0
Brightech Scorpion SCP02 208.8 0
PowerAll Deluxe PBJS12000-R 197.1 0
Beüler Solar Battery Power Pack 184 0
Cobra JumPack XL CPP 12000 164.4 0
Schumacher Red Fuel SL161 145.4 0
For our first round of tests, in spring 2017, we drained our Jeep’s battery to between 9 and 10.5 volts before each test so that it was too weak to start the vehicle. Then we recorded the current that each jump starter delivered. Although this was not a perfect measurement, the results and the starter behavior helped us determine which jump starters could provide the most power.
Because we wanted to see how the jump starters performed in real vehicles, we re-created a dead-battery scenario in different vehicles. For our initial round of tests in early 2017, we used a 4.0 L six-cylinder Jeep Wrangler and a 5.7 L V8 Ram 1500. For our latest test, we used a 3.6 L V6 Ram 1500. (Most midsize sedans and compact cars have smaller six- or four-cylinder engines, and should require even less power to get going than our test vehicles.) In each case, we took a healthy battery, which typically has a charge of over 12 volts, and drained it down to between 9 and 10.5 volts, which is “dead” in practical terms. That left our vehicles completely lifeless—no lights, no ignition clicking, dead-as-a-doornail dead.

Starting current (amps)
Weego
22s
PowerAll
XL1
PowerAll
Deluxe
PBJS12…
12.7 V
starter
battery
0
1.25
2.5
3.75
5
6.25
7.5
8.75
10
11.25
12.5
13.75
15
0
50
100
150
Elapsed time (seconds)
Elapsed time (seconds) Weego 22s PowerAll XL1 PowerAll Deluxe PBJS12000-R 12.7 V starter battery
0 23.8 17.9 -0.7 0.6
0.25 23.7 17.9 -0.7 0.6
0.5 17.3 17.9 -0.7 0.6
0.75 0.8 17.8 -0.6 0.6
1 0.8 17.8 -0.6 0.6
1.25 25.1 17.8 -0.7 0.6
1.5 25 17.7 29.7 0.6
1.75 24.1 17.7 61.6 0.6
2 24 17.7 58.8 0.6
2.25 23.9 17.6 56.1 0.6
2.5 23.9 17.6 53.2 0.6
2.75 25 17.6 50.9 0.6
3 25 17.5 49 0.6
3.25 24.9 17.5 48.1 0.6
3.5 24.8 17.5 46.6 0.6
3.75 24.7 17.4 45.4 0.6
4 24.5 17.4 44.4 0.6
4.25 24.4 17.4 43.6 0.6
4.5 24.2 17.4 42.4 0.6
4.75 24.1 17.4 42.3 0.6
5 24 17.4 41.4 0.6
5.25 23.9 17.3 40.5 0.6
5.5 23.8 17.3 40.4 0.6
5.75 23.7 17.3 39.5 0.6
6 20.9 17.2 39.5 0.6
6.25 0.8 17.2 38.6 0.6
6.5 0.8 17.1 38.5 0.6
6.75 24.5 17.1 38.4 0.6
7 24.5 17.1 37.4 0.6
7.25 24.4 17.1 37.3 0.6
7.5 24.4 17 37.3 0.6
7.75 31.7 21.9 42.7 0.6
8 128.1 24.6 45.7 0.6
8.25 149.2 122 163.1 153.4
8.5 128.1 108 158.7 153.4
8.75 105.9 81.4 122.9 106.3
9 28.3 27.4 46.2 0.9
9.25 27.2 26.4 44.9 0.9
9.5 27.1 25.2 44.8 0.9
9.75 18.9 14.7 29.9 0.9
10 11.3 7.4 18.5 0.9
10.25 3.5 1.2 9.5 0.9
10.5 -3.1 -4.5 1.3 0.9
10.75 -9.8 -10.1 -6.6 0.9
11 -16.3 -15.9 -14.3 0.9
11.25 -23.4 -21 -21.9 0.9
11.5 -30.1 -27.2 -29.6 0.9
11.75 -30.1 -30.1 -29.6 0.9
12 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
12.25 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
12.5 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
12.75 0.7 0.4 0 0.8
13 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
13.25 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
13.5 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
13.75 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
14 0.7 0.4 0 0.8
14.25 0.7 0.4 0 0.8
14.5 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
14.75 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
15 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
15.25 0.7 0.4 0 0.9
To test the new Weego 22s and PowerAll XL1 for our latest update, we used a Ram 1500 pickup truck with a 3.6 L V8 engine and a battery drained to between 9 and 10.5 volts for each jump start. This graph shows the current spikes we measured from the jump starters to the battery when we started the truck. Again, although it’s not a perfect measurement, this procedure helped us determine which jump starters could provide the most power. (We’ve included an additional measurement with the PowerAll Deluxe, plus a starter battery charged to 12.7 volts, for comparison.)
One by one, we attached each jump starter to the battery and started the car, measuring the amount of current running out of the jump starter with a digital clamp meter. Because running the engine for even a short time can add a surface charge to a car’s battery, we ran the lights and other accessories after each jump-starter test until we got the battery’s charge back down to 10.5 V or less and had a consistent reading for at least five minutes. Though this procedure was not a perfect measurement—we couldn’t reproduce the car battery’s condition exactly each time—every jump starter did manage to turn over the engine and give us a measurement of its starting power.

A portable jump starter attached to a car battery next to a digital clamp meter and iphone.
We used a digital clamp meter to measure the current from each model while jump-starting our test vehicles. We recorded the results to a smartphone for later analysis. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
To test the reverse-polarity protection on each jump starter, we did exactly what you shouldn’t do: We connected the cables backward by connecting each jump starter’s positive clamp to the battery’s negative terminal and then attaching the negative clamp to the positive terminal. (For this test, our car battery wasn’t installed in a vehicle and wasn’t near any conductive or combustible materials, and we wore protective gear just to be on the safe side.)

On models with no safety protection, the sparks were a sure sign that a model deserved dismissal.

The best models not only stopped the connection and prevented any sparks from occurring, but also issued visual and audible alerts—the louder the better—to warn us that we’d done something wrong. Some models had only error lights, which would be easy to miss in certain conditions, while the worst models lacked any protection at all. In the latter case, the sparks were a sure sign that a model deserved dismissal.

The weego 22s and powerall xl1 portable jump starters sitting on a wooden table with their cords.
For our latest update, we tested the new Weego 22s (left) and PowerAll XL1 (right). Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
We also had a few people try out the clamps to get a feel for their strength, resistance, and build quality. But seven of the 12 clamp sets we tried are made by the same factory or created using the same design, and while they didn’t break in our tests, those clamps didn’t feel very sturdy—we worried that they could pop off or become stressed when twisted or connected at odd angles. We found that the models with a unique clamp design were easier to connect and more secure than the models with the widely available generic clamps. We also found that the length of the cables could vary; some lower-quality models had only a 3-inch cable on one clamp, while the best models had up to 10 inches for both clamps. That said, even though the longer cables made life a little easier, we didn’t have a problem finding a place to rest the packs with short cables.

Our pick: Weego Jump Starter 22s
The Weego 22s portable jump starter clipped onto a car battery.
Photo: Mark Smirniotis
Our pick
Weego Jump Starter 22s
Weego Jump Starter 22s
Good power and a great value
This model gives you the best overall value, with the power to start most cars and midsize SUVs, as well as the best clamps and safety features, all for a reasonable price.

$63* from Amazon
$66 from Walmart
*At the time of publishing, the price was $60.

We recommend the Weego Jump Starter 22s as the best portable jump starter for most drivers because it offers all the important features you need, as well as the best clamp design, for a lower price than the competition—a price it achieves by leaving out unnecessary extras. The Weego 22s has plenty of starting power for most cars and midsize SUVs. Its strong, easy-to-use clamps make a good connection on a variety of battery posts. Its safety features protect you and your car. And the device is easy to stow, so you’re never without it.

The Weego 22s has plenty of starting power for most cars and midsize SUVs, along with the best clamps of any brand we tested.

In our tests, the Weego 22s easily started the 3.6 L six-cylinder engine in a pickup truck with a completely dead battery. That engine needs more power than those in most compact cars and sedans, and is a good stand-in for SUVs up to the size of a 2017 Honda Pilot. (If you have an engine much bigger than that, check out our upgrade pick.) The Weego 22s delivered a peak of about 150 A when it was needed, just about the same as a standard, fully charged car battery provided before we started testing. That put the Weego 22s between the PowerAll XL1 (122 A) and the PowerAll Deluxe (163 A) in terms of starting power, which makes us confident that it can deliver plenty of power for most vehicles.

Even the most powerful jump starter is of no use if you’re afraid to use it, or if it damages your car because you made a mistake hooking it up. Weego jump starters, including the 22s, have the best safety features of any of the dozen models we’ve tried. Reverse-polarity protection is the most important feature, as it checks the polarity before completing the circuit, preventing sparks and electrical-system damage in case you connect the clamps to the wrong battery terminals. (Always connect the positive clamp to the positive post and then attach the negative clamp to the negative post.) Eleven of the 12 models we tested have reverse-polarity protection, and eight of them give some sort of audible alert that something is wrong. But compared with any other model we’ve tried, Weego’s jump starters have a louder, two-tone alert and more-visible error lights. For anyone who’s a novice under the hood, this clear, impossible-to-ignore feedback makes it easy to confirm that you’re hooking everything up right, so you can quickly be on your way.

A hand holding the smarty clamps from the weego 22s portable jump starter.
The Smarty Clamps on the Weego 22s are a smaller version of the same excellent design that comes with the Weego 44, but they add new tips to help you clamp to battery posts in tight spaces. Photo: Mark Smirniotis
Weego’s Smarty Clamps are the most noticeable of the features that make the Jump Starter 22s our top pick. Weego introduced the clamp design in the larger Jump Starter 44, which we still recommend as an upgrade pick. The 22s uses a smaller version of the same clamp, with handy needle-nose tips instead of the blunt nose on the clamps of the 44. For hands of all strengths and sizes, the scissor-like mechanism is easy to squeeze all the way open, but it still grips tightly to battery posts at a variety of angles. And the clamps don’t twist or flex like the generic design used by every competitor except for PowerAll. When cheaper clamps twist, they make it hard to get a secure connection, or threaten to pop off battery terminals altogether. We felt confident in the connection every time we used the Weego clamps, on three different test vehicles (plus a few other cars we’ve helped out in pinch).

Most companies offer a one-year warranty on their portable jump starters, but Weego backs its models for 18 months. The downside is that Weego continues to offer only Web and email support options. (PowerAll, one of the few companies to offer phone support, sticks to a one-year warranty.) Antigravity Batteries, which bests the competition with both a three-year warranty and phone support, has other downsides that we talk about in the Competition section.

A hand holding the weego 22s portable jump starter.
The Weego 22s is slimmer than most jump starters and has room for only the jump port and a Micro-USB charging port behind the rubber flap. Photo: Mark Smirniotis
The Weego 22s has about half the charge capacity of the average jump starter, just 20 Wh when full. Though this lower capacity would be a drawback in a professional garage, or even for a home mechanic who frequently jump-starts troublesome vehicles, we don’t think it’s a problem for most drivers. Jump starters need to output a lot of power in a fraction of a second in order to get an engine moving, but those peaks don’t amount to much cumulative power for each jump. The real effect the lower capacity has is on how frequently you should charge the device’s battery if you don’t use it: You should assume that any battery pack will lose 2 to 5 percent of its charge every month it sits around, so in the case of the Weego 22s, you should plug it in every few months to top it off, whereas larger models might be able to go six months to a year without a charge.

We like that the Weego 22s comes with a bare minimum of accessories. Other jump starter kits are overloaded with redundant or unnecessary features, and have higher prices because of them. An onboard flashlight seems convenient, but you probably have one on your phone. USB outlets for charging electronic devices aren’t necessary if your car is running and can provide power, and if it’s not, then you should be using the precious battery life in the jump starter for your engine. Plus, many people carry a USB power bank for their portable devices anyway. The same goes for jump starters that include charging cords and tips for laptops: If you need to charge your laptop on the go, we recommend that you buy something to do that instead of stealing power from your emergency supplies. (These accessories also mean more pieces to keep track of, and a larger carrying case that’s harder to stash in a glove box.) That said, Weego sells a version of the 22s, the Jump Starter 22, that includes a work light and a USB port for charging phones, as well as better sealing against water and dirt. It typically costs about $40 more, though.

The Weego 22s package includes a USB-A–to–Micro-USB cable to charge the device itself using any USB charger, plus a small carrying bag that holds the battery pack and clamps and fits in a glove box. The instructions are conveniently printed on the back of the jump starter, in full color, so you don’t have another thing to lose.

Flaws but not dealbreakers
We like that the Jump Starter 22s charges via Micro-USB, instead of a proprietary DC jack. This means that you can recharge it from any USB charger you use for your phone or tablet, instead of having to keep track of a special wall or car charger. But Micro-USB ports can take less power than most DC jacks, so the battery inside can’t recharge as fast. In the big scheme of things, this is a minor flaw, especially because the 22s has a relatively small capacity that doesn’t take long to fill anyway. Still, we hope that future versions of the 22s switch to a USB-C port so that we can continue to benefit from the convenience of universal charging and enjoy the faster charging speeds that USB-C offers.

Runner-up: PowerAll Deluxe
The powerall deluxe portable jump starter sitting on top of a car battery.
Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
Runner-up
PowerAll Deluxe PBJS12000-R
PowerAll Deluxe PBJS12000-R
More power without paying a lot more
This model can start larger V8 engines, and it has effective safety features and sturdy clamps almost as good as our top pick’s.

$71* from Walmart
Buy from Amazon
*At the time of publishing, the price was $78.

If you need to jump-start a larger engine than our top pick can handle, or if the Weego 22s isn’t available or costs more than about $80 when you’re shopping, we recommend the PowerAll Deluxe PBJS12000-R for its combination of power, safety features, build quality, and value. It’s a little more powerful than our top pick, it has a larger capacity, and it comes with extra features such as a flashlight and a USB port for phone and laptop charging. But cars and midsize SUVs generally won’t need the extra power, so most people won’t get extra value in paying the higher price. And although PowerAll’s clamps are better than those that other competitors use, they aren’t quite as good as those of our less expensive top pick from Weego.

In our first round of testing, the PowerAll Deluxe started our dead 10-year-old Jeep Wrangler with a 4.0 L six-cylinder engine without a problem. It provided 200 amps to boost our battery, in line with the best of the jump starters we tested.

The PowerAll Deluxe also performed well in our early-2017 tests with the larger 5.7 L V8 engine in one of our Ram 1500 pickups. When we connected the PowerAll Deluxe and hit the ignition, it delivered a little over 200 amps, and the truck growled to life. Of the five jump starters we tested on that truck, only three managed to revive it. (We weren’t able to test the Weego 22s on that vehicle.) Even though the other two successful models provided about 10 percent more power than the PowerAll Deluxe in our tests, they both cost twice as much.

The PowerAll Deluxe’s clamps feel solid, and they open wide and spring closed tightly.

Similar to our top pick, the PowerAll Deluxe ensures that you can start your vehicle safely, even if you’ve never jump-started a car before. With its reverse-polarity protection, if you accidentally connect the positive clamp to the negative post and vice versa, the pack senses the reversal and stops the connection. Instead, an error light and an audible alert warn you that something is wrong. That said, the PowerAll Deluxe is not quite as good about feedback as the Weego models: The two small LEDs on the inline control box that tell you the status are labeled with raised black-on-black lettering that’s hard to read in the dark, and the lights themselves are pretty dim. The clear alarm tone helps overcome that problem, but it’s not as loud or noticeable as the two-tone alert that the Weego models use to warn you something is wrong.

A hand holding the powerall deluxe clamps from the portable jump starter.
The PowerAll Deluxe’s clamps are better made than those of every pack we tried except the Weego models. They open wide, clamp tight, and don’t twist or bend. Photo: Mark Smirniotis
The PowerAll Deluxe comes with better clamps than those of every other jump starter we tested except the Weego models. They feel solid, and they open wide and spring closed tightly, ensuring a good, safe connection. In addition, some of the competing generic clamps have their safety circuits and error lights on a big box right on the plug, near the connection to the battery pack; this design feels like a stress point that would make it easier to knock the cable out. The best arrangement, like that on the PowerAll Deluxe and the Weego models, puts the safety circuitry and error lights inline on the cable, where they stay out of the way.

A hand holding the powerall deluxe portable jump starter.
A matte finish and ridges help keep the PowerAll Deluxe from sliding around. Though the jump-starting port is covered by a rubber flap, the other ports are exposed. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
The PowerAll Deluxe is one of six models we tried with a skid-resistant surface, in this case a combination of a matte finish and small ridges, to prevent them from sliding around. The port to connect the jump-starter cable is protected behind a rubber flap, but the two USB ports and the DC recharging port are both exposed.

Though a headlamp is a better lighting source for any roadside emergency kit, the light on the PowerAll Deluxe is plenty bright if your cell phone is dead. Otherwise, it might be a bit redundant. For charging electronic devices, this PowerAll model includes a multifunction cable that you can plug into the battery pack’s USB port and fit with different tips for connecting to a Micro-USB port, a Lightning-connector port, or a 30-pin port (such as on an older iPod). The kit also comes with a wall charger, as well as a standard 12 V car charger for charging the jumper pack from your car’s accessory outlet (while the car is running, of course); you should plan to plug it in for a top-off every six months or so.

Though PowerAll’s one-year warranty is not as long as the 18-month warranty Weego offers on its models or the three-year coverage from Antigravity, PowerAll does provide phone support during regular business hours, in addition to email-based support.

The powerall deluxe portable jump start kit in its carrying case.
Everything fits, but the chintzy plastic case never feels well-organized. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
It might be nitpicking, but the rigid plastic case that comes with the PowerAll Deluxe is chintzy and cumbersome. The hinges and latches feel too delicate for something that may see rough use in a garage or get pushed around and forgotten in the back of a trunk. Inside, a molded-plastic insert has a spot for each part—the battery, the cables and clamps, and the accessories—but it’s laid out in such a way that we could never get things to sit just right. (The company includes a much better case with the new XL1 model, which we describe in the Competition section below.)

Upgrade pick: Weego Jump Starter 44
The weego 44 portable jump starter sitting on a car battery.
Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
Upgrade pick
Weego Jump Starter 44
Weego Jump Starter 44
The best combination of power and usability
Offers the same sturdy clamp design as our top pick, plus the extra power to start larger V8 engines. It costs more, but every feature is just a little better.

$124* from Amazon
*At the time of publishing, the price was $150.

The Weego Jump Starter 44 stood out as the best overall model in our tests, so it’s worth the upgrade if you have the budget. While we found its starting power to be roughly the same as that of the less-expensive PowerAll Deluxe, our runner-up pick, Weego’s clamps are the best made and best designed of any of the other jump-starter brands we tried. They can make a firm connection on virtually any size battery post, and they should survive hard use for years.

Weego’s clamps are the best of any jump starter we tried.

Like the PowerAll Deluxe, the Weego Jump Starter 44 was able to start the engine on our largest test vehicle—a 2017 Ram 1500 pickup truck with a 5.7 L V8—with ease. After jump-starting the smaller engine on a Jeep, providing 185 amps for that task, the Weego 44 boosted 230 A into the starting system on the Ram. (The PowerAll was in the same ballpark, though a little lower when starting the pickup truck.) Although the numbers can fluctuate a little, the important part is that even a large engine with a very drained battery can rise from the dead when you have a Weego Jump Starter 44 on hand.

A close up of the cables on the weego 44 portable jump starter, showing the reverse-onnection warning lights.
The reverse-connection warning lights on the Weego 44’s cables are very bright, and the audible alert is louder than that of any other jump starter. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
When we attached the Weego to a car battery with the connections reversed, not only was the unit smart enough to detect the problem and prevent any sparking or shorts, but it also had the loudest audible alarm of any of the models we tried. It immediately starts an alternating tone that you can’t miss, even if you’re stranded somewhere with loud traffic whizzing by. We also found the error lights to be easy to see, giving a clear indication that we had made a mistake.

A close up of the weego smarty clamps attached to a car battery.
The Smarty Clamps on the Weego 44 blow away most of the competition in design and build quality. They open wider and easier than the rest, and make it easy to get a firm connection on any battery. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
As on the Weego 22s, the standout feature of the Weego 44 is its pair of clamps, called Smarty Clamps. We noted that many jump starters use identical, generic clamps that are cheaply made, prone to twisting, and hard to position for a solid connection on some battery posts. Not the Weego 44: We found its clamps easier to open than all the others, and this pair opened wider. As on most models, the Weego 44’s cable is connected to each clamp with a crimp fitting, but it’s also screwed down for extra durability. Plus, the cable is slightly thicker—8 AWG instead of the more common 10 AWG—and longer than on the competition: Both sides have 10 inches of cable between the status box and the clamps, giving you a lot of room to maneuver.

A close up of the cable attachments and led flashlights on the end of the weego 44 portable jump start.
We like that all the Weego 44’s ports, as well as its dual-LED flashlights, are protected by a weather-resistant cover. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
Even the minor features of the Weego 44 are a little better than those of the competition. Our runner-up pick, for example, has a flap to protect the jumper port from the elements, but it leaves the USB and recharging ports exposed. The Weego 44 keeps all of its ports behind a flip-up door that allows the dual flashlight bulbs to shine through when you need them. (The recharging port is on the other end, similarly protected behind a flap.)

All of the Weego 44’s ports are behind a flip-up door that allows the dual flashlight bulbs to shine through.

The Weego 44 gives you two carrying options. The carrying case is styled like a tin lunch box, which is charming and convenient but not that sturdy and too big for most glove boxes. But you also get a small weatherproof zippered sack that holds everything and can go anywhere you can cram it in your car. The package comes with a wall charger and a standard 12 V socket car charger—you should plan to plug it in for a top-off every six months or so. We’re fond of the convenience of Micro-USB charging, as the smaller Weego 22s offers, but the inclusion of both chargers with the Weego 44 is a more standard setup. The only other included accessory is a small lanyard and hook for hanging the device from your hood. If you’re hoping for more device cables or other charging accessories, Weego has a few extra adapters available in its shop.

A hand pulling the clamps for the weego 44 portable jump starter out of their orange case.
You can stow everything in the included pouch until you need it. Photo: Kyle Fitzgerald
Though Weego doesn’t offer the longest warranty of the brands we considered—that would be Antigravity, with its three-year guarantee—the company does cover any defects for 18 months, which is longer than average. Support is only Web and email based, unfortunately.

The competition
Here’s a rundown of the other jump starters we tested, and why they didn’t stack up to our picks.

A hand holding the clamp from the powerall xl1 portable jump starter.
The clamps on the PowerAll XL1 are bulked up compared with the company’s Deluxe model. Though very strong and sturdy, they’re a bit large for even average hands, and they require some oomph to open. Photo: Mark Smirniotis
The new PowerAll XL1 is the next generation of the Deluxe model, our runner-up. Externally, the pack is identical to its predecessor, though a company representative told us that the cells and internal components were updated. The XL1 uses a clamp design, similar to that of the Deluxe, that makes solid contact with battery terminals and avoids flexing and bending. But the XL1’s clamps are much larger than the Deluxe’s and have much stiffer springs—they require stronger, larger hands to open comfortably. In our tests, the XL1’s starting output was comparable to that of the previous version, so it should have no problem starting large, V8 engines. The carrying case is also drastically improved from the one that comes with the Deluxe. But these improvements come with a higher price tag and limited availability. For a little less, you can get the Deluxe with clamps that are easier to use, or for a little more you can get our upgrade pick and its multiple extra benefits.

The Brightech Scorpion SCP02 was our original jump-starter pick, in the initial versions of “The Best Gear for Your Road Trip” and “The Best Gear for a Roadside Emergency” back in 2015. In our tests for those guides, conducted on a Nissan Juke crossover, it provided the second most powerful jumping current and had better overall construction than the most powerful model. It also provided almost as much starting power in our first round of tests for this guide as our picks did. But it uses the cheaper, generic clamps that we now consider a major drawback since better clamps are available. It also comes with an annoying zippered case that secures everything with awkward elastic loops. Compared with our new top picks, this Brightech model is not worth the savings of 10 or so dollars.

The Antigravity Batteries Micro-Start XP-10 is built by one of the most respected brands in portable jump starters, and it earned the highest rating in Consumer Reports’s tests of jump starters (subscription required). But those tests weren’t conducted recently, and one of the things Consumer Reports likes most is the XP-10’s reserve capacity, saying its extra storage “will allow for longer run times of cell phones, laptops, its built-in LED light and other electronics.” As we’ve previously noted, we don’t prioritize that capacity when evaluating jump starters (as we do for USB battery packs), focusing more on starting power, safety, and build quality. In our output tests, the XP-10 tied with our upgrade pick, the Weego 44, when we measured the current it provided to our dead pickup truck. Unfortunately, the included clamps are the same generic ones found on many other jump starters. In addition, at the time of this writing the XP-10 retails for roughly twice the price of our top pick and a bit more than our upgrade pick, yet it comes with only a clumsy zippered case with elastic loops to store everything. Though Antigravity’s three-year warranty is the best of any jump-starter company we’ve found—our picks come with 12- and 18-month warranties—we don’t think that alone is worth the extra cost for most people.

The Anker Compact Car Jump Starter and Portable Charger provides only an error light when its battery connections are reversed, unlike our picks, which also have an audible tone that immediately tells you something is wrong. And although this model started our SUV as easily as our picks did, it failed to start the larger V8 engine in our pickup truck, likely due to the starter battery having a voltage below this Anker model’s safety threshold. (Each jump starter automatically checks the voltage on your car battery, and if it determines that the battery is too far gone, the jump starter will refuse the connection instead of risking damage. This threshold varies from model to model, and the Anker’s was likely set higher than the ones in our picks.)

The Bolt Power D28A lacks any protection against reversed connections. When we connected the negative clamp to the positive post and attached the positive clamp to the negative post, the final connection sparked and the metal fused together, chewing up our battery post when we removed it.

The Cobra Electronics JumPack XL CPP 12000 wasn’t the strongest performer in our SUV-engine test, but it did turn the engine over. As it’s one of the few models that claim to start V8 engines, we gave it a shot on our V8 Ram 1500, but it failed to start the 5.7-liter engine, a disappointment considering that this Cobra model retails for a similar price as our upgrade pick. We suspect this happened because the truck battery was below the Cobra jump starter’s safety threshold, as with the Anker model. On top of that, the JumPack XL lacks an audible alarm to notify you of a reversed connection, which is something we like about our picks from Weego and PowerAll.

The PowerAll Supreme PBJS16000-RS is almost identical to the company’s Deluxe model, but it claims a slightly higher CCA rating for more starting power, has 30 percent more capacity (16,000 mAh versus 12,000 mAh), and costs about $20 more. Since the less expensive Deluxe was able to start our large pickup-truck engine and offers plenty of capacity to do the job a few times, we don’t see any reason for most people to spring for this model instead.

The Schumacher Red Fuel SL161 was the least expensive jump starter we tested, and the second cheapest on our initial 40-model list. This one just barely managed to start our SUV, though, and the engine sounded as if it wouldn’t make it. The SL161 would probably have an easier time with a smaller car, but that limits its flexibility. In addition, the only sign of an error when we connected the pack backward was a single flash of a small LED. As evidenced by the price and the chintzy storage sack, this model isn’t meant to be a top-of-the-line choice, but our top pick doesn’t cost that much more money, and we think it will be the more reliable jump starter over the long run.

The Beüler Solar Battery Power Pack is an outlier that piqued our curiosity enough for us to include it in our tests. In addition to charging conventionally, this foldable unit has two solar panels for charging up anywhere off the grid, a unique feature among jump starters. That said, its solar cells are mainly for replenishing enough power to charge small personal electronics; recharging the pack enough to start a car would take a very long time. Moreover, the Beüler model currently retails for more than three times the price of our top pick, and more than a couple of new car batteries.

The 2019 Apple Smart Battery Case Review

Tragic as it appears to be here and there, couple of things in life are as remarkably unpleasant as utilizing a telephone whose battery is o...